‘Big Tech’ dominance puts index on shifting sands
Insights

‘Big Tech’ dominance puts index on shifting sands

The changing nature of an index driven by the rise of technology firms, which typically pay low or no dividends, has led to a large structural bias against income investors. So how do they prosper in such an environment?

Technological disruption has not only affected individual sectors, but the global equity index1 as a whole. However, looking purely at the Information Technology (IT) sector is misleading: MSCI changed the industry classifications at the end of September 2018, creating a Communications Services sector which integrated telecommunications, media and internet companies. This was ostensibly to reflect the evolution in the way people communicate and access entertainment content, but it also saw companies such as Alphabet, Facebook, Alibaba and Baidu shift out of the IT sector.

Figure 1: Big five US tech firms – weighting in index
A graph showing Big five US tech firms – weighting in index
Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investments and FactSet

This allowed investors to own more of the “Big Tech”2 firms without breaching allocation limits to a single sector. It also likely helped accelerate the increase in the index weighting of Big Tech (Figure 1), which has gone from less than 5% of the index at the back end of 2014 to more than 10% at the end of 2019. While the US’s representation in the index has also climbed a few percentage points to 56%, the proportion of the big five US tech firmswithin this has gone from 8% to 16% 4. Typically, these companies pay low or no dividend payments, preferring to focus on acquiring market share, other companies or their own shares.

Figure 2: Big five US tech firms – weighting in index
A percent bar graph showing Big five US tech firms – weighting in index
Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investments and FactSet

What is an income investor to do?

The rise of Big Tech and the US outperformance more generally has led to an increasingly large structural bias versus the index against income investors who avoid stocks offering low or minimal dividends. Our approach, however, favours focusing on highly free cash flow-generative companies that are allocating capital optimally. We like companies that are delivering top-line growth while making sizeable capital returns to shareholders, as we believe this promotes efficient use of capital and prioritisation of investment.

Historically we have had a singular focus on dividends, but this has led to an increasing proportion of our risk budget being driven by what we can’t own due to the shifting sands of the index. Consequently, we think focusing on shareholder yield, which incorporates share buybacks as well as dividends, improves the opportunity set in terms of sector and regional breakdown, and allows us to reduce the structural risks that have arisen over time and accelerated in 2019.

Therefore, rather than only investing in companies with a dividend yield above that of the index, we shall now target those with both a dividend yield of more than 1% – we are an income fund after all! – and a shareholder yield greater than the dividend yield on the index. In other words, we are looking for the same level of capital return from the companies in which we invest but acknowledge the different means through which this can be done.

Figure 3: A more balanced opportunity set
A table showing regional and sector breakdown by weight
Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investments and FactSet

Figure 3 demonstrates the impact. The opportunity set now more closely resembles our index, with the 12.2% underweight to North America dropping to just 1.8% and the IT exposure comparable to that of the index. At a stock level, that’s a 30% increase in North American names to 331 against an index of 709. Further, it boosts the number of names available in the IT sector by around 50% to 108, while Healthcare increases by more than 40% to 48.

What outcome does this have for portfolios?

Our underlying philosophy is unchanged. We focus on consistent and wise capital allocation; this remains the case, but we will now be incorporating regular share repurchases into our capital return metrics. We will still seek high dividend yields and will not be buying zero or minimal dividend yield stocks. The rest is unchanged in terms of growth and sustainability of capital return, but we have the flexibility to mitigate the structural risks that have built over time and accelerated in 2019.

We recognise the index has shifted over time and believe that focusing on shareholder yield, which incorporates share repurchases as well as dividends, enables income investors to better build a balanced and diversified portfolio of stocks that provide both a high income and a competitive risk-adjusted return versus the index. the structural risks that have built over time and accelerated in 2019.

20 June 2020
A photo showing Jonathan Crown
Jonathan Crown
Portfolio Manager
Share article
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Key topics
Related topics
apple-podcast
Spotify
listen-on-Stitcher-badge
castbox
Share article
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Key topics
Related topics

PDF

‘Big Tech’ dominance puts index on shifting sands

1 MSCI ACWI
2 Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent
3 Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Amazon
4 Columbia Threadneedle Investments/FactSet analysis

Important Information

The research and analysis included on this website has been produced by Columbia Threadneedle Investments for its own investment management activities, may have been acted upon prior to publication and is made available here incidentally. Any opinions expressed are made as at the date of publication but are subject to change without notice and should not be seen as investment advice. Information obtained from external sources is believed to be reliable but its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed.

Related Insights

25 February 2021

Iain Richards

Head Of Responsible Investment

Climate change, net zero and the employment myth

Press headlines have suggesting that as many as 10 million UK jobs would be at risk from the UK’s transition to net zero over the next three decades. Is that really the potential implication of the UK’s decarbonisation plan?
Read time - 8 min
22 February 2021

Fixed Income Desk

In Credit - Weekly Snapshot

In Credit Weekly Snapshot - February 2021

Our fixed income team provide their weekly snapshot of market events.
Read time - 3 min
12 February 2021

Paul DiGiacomo

Head of Equity Research

Covid-19 index: when might life return to ‘normal’?

With every country attempting to return to normality following the coronavirus pandemic, we are monitoring US economic activity as well as other measures of 'normality' such as entertainment and leisure, high street shopping, and schools reopening.
Read time - 5 min

You may also like

Investment approach

Teamwork defines us and is fundamental to our investment approach, which is structured to facilitate the generation, assessment and implementation of good, strong investment ideas for our portfolios.

Funds and Prices

Columbia Threadneedle Investments has a comprehensive range of investment funds catering for a broad range of objectives.

Our Capabilities

We offer a broad range of actively managed investment strategies and solutions covering global, regional and domestic markets and asset classes.